Sending at the Wrong Frequency
RSSThe fact that things like this can be found on it is the only reason I don’t think the entire internet should be burned to its foundation.
I don’t understand why this didn’t get more popular and turn into a regular event.
….that’s sarcasm, by the way.
-
dataangel reblogged this from porcelain72 and added:
understand why this didn’t get more popular and turn into a regular event. ….that’s sarcasm, by
-
dataangel liked this
-
porcelain72 posted this
About Sending at the Wrong Frequency
"According to a 2004 New York Times article on the subject, this particular baleen whale has apparently been tracked by NOAA since 1992, using a 'classified array of hydrophones employed by the Navy to monitor enemy submarines.' It sings at 52 Hertz, which is roughly the same frequency as the lowest note on a tuba, and much higher than its fellow whales, whose calls fall in the 15 to 25 Hertz range.
"Not only does it sing too high, it also fails to travel along any known migration route of any baleen whale species -- so other whales can't hear it, and they don't run into it along migration paths.
"She's lonely because no one else can hear her."
"Not only does it sing too high, it also fails to travel along any known migration route of any baleen whale species -- so other whales can't hear it, and they don't run into it along migration paths.
"She's lonely because no one else can hear her."
Posts I Like
-
Cannes 2012.
-
[15/25] Ewan McGregor | Photoshoots
-
-
-
